第 1 名
Qatar Airways
8.0/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
- Reliability & operations
- 9
- Comfort & experience
- 9
- Value & network
- 6
- Passenger ratings
- 8
Value for money scores just 3.69 on Skytrax, and complaints flag chaotic airport boarding.
独立评分,无付费置顶
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分是我们对预订之后实际乘坐体验给出的编辑评分,满分 10 分。我们出票的每家航空公司都按同样的指标评分,因此预订前可以在同一标准下比较这些数字。
按评分从高到低排列。每项指标都是编辑团队对公开事实的评估,每个航空公司页面都附有各自数字的来源。 我们如何为航空公司评分
第 1 名
8.0/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
Value for money scores just 3.69 on Skytrax, and complaints flag chaotic airport boarding.
第 2 名
7.8/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
On-time performance of 70.7%, and no Wi-Fi, seatback screens or power outlets on board.
第 3 名
7.8/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
No issuer-named passenger rating is supplied, and Wi-Fi isn't guaranteed fleet-wide.
第 4 名
7.8/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
On-time performance (78.58% in 2025) is solid but ranks fourth in Asia-Pacific, short of the region’s very best.
第 5 名
7.5/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
A long list of ancillary charges, from seat selection fees to INR 800-per-kg excess baggage.
第 6 名
7.3/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
Ancillary bag fees, including a 45 EUR airport carry-on charge and up to 135 EUR overweight fees.
第 7 名
7.1/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
No confirmed passenger rating body or award, leaving reputation unresearched.
第 8 名
7.0/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
No confirmed Skytrax star rating or passenger review score was supplied.
第 9 名
7.0/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
Ancillary fees stack up, from £25 airport check-in to US$180 extra bags on US routes
第 10 名
7.0/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
Passenger feedback is mixed, and the airline's published fare and baggage rules vary by route and cabin.
第 11 名
6.8/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
Passenger ratings, dragged down by a 2.42 Skytrax ground service score and 41% recommend rate.
第 12 名
6.8/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
Passenger sentiment, with Skytrax value for money at just 2.1 and 27% recommending the airline.
第 13 名
6.5/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
Passenger ratings, dragged down by a Skytrax ground service score of 2.59 and a 36% recommend rate.
第 14 名
6.3/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
Passenger ratings, dragged down by a Skytrax value-for-money score of just 2.47.
第 15 名
6.3/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
Passenger ratings, dragged down by a 2.35 Skytrax value-for-money score and 30% recommend rate.
第 16 名
6.3/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
Passenger sentiment, with Skytrax value for money at 1.78 and only 14% recommending it
第 17 名
6.3/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
Weak Skytrax scores, including a 1.67 wifi rating and 67% recommend rate.
第 18 名
6.0/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
Passenger sentiment lags, with just a 29% recommend rate and 3.33 Skytrax ground service score.
第 19 名
6.0/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
Independently verifiable passenger-survey data on seat comfort, wifi and ground service is not available for this carrier, so the comfort and service picture rests on published specs alone.
第 20 名
5.5/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
No published seat pitch, meals, Wi-Fi or entertainment for the Economy cabin.
第 21 名
5.5/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
Passenger sentiment, with a 19% recommend rate and 1.76 Skytrax ground service score.
第 22 名
5.5/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
OAG's 62.70% on-time figure for August 2026 ranks JetBlue 14th of the North American carriers tracked
第 23 名
5.5/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
Passenger sentiment, with only a 51% recommend rate and 2.72/5 ground service on Skytrax.
第 24 名
5.3/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
Tight economy seating from 28in pitch and low Skytrax comfort scores, including a 2.49 seat comfort rating.
第 25 名
5.3/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
Skytrax passenger ratings, with food, wifi and entertainment all scoring below 1.3 out of 5
第 26 名
5.3/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
30-inch pitch and 16.6 to 17.8-inch seat width in Boeing 737-800 Main Cabin, and a 3-star SkyTrax rating
第 27 名
5.3/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
A 7% recommend rate and Skytrax ground service scored 1.45/5
第 28 名
5.3/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
An unbundled fare can become more expensive after bags and seat selection.
第 29 名
5.0/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
Passenger ratings, with only 14% recommending the airline and ground service scored 1.64 out of 5.
第 30 名
5.0/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
Tight 28-29in economy pitch and weak Skytrax sub-scores, including a 1.87 value-for-money rating.
第 31 名
5.0/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
Passenger sentiment, with only 15% of reviews recommending the airline and a 1.72 value-for-money score.
第 32 名
4.8/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
Economy seat pitch of 28in and no published Skytrax rating or award.
第 33 名
4.5/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
A bare-bones onboard product: single economy cabin, no published seat pitch, and meals, seats and baggage all sold as separate add-ons.
第 34 名
4.5/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
No comparable current annual on-time or cancellation result was verified. The Basic fare has no checked bag, Wi-Fi is limited to Boeing 787 flights, and processing fees vary by departure market and payment method.
第 35 名
4.5/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
A 77.04% on-time rate (Cirium, 2025) and low Skytrax scores across seat comfort and value for money.
第 36 名
4.4/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
A 28.3in seat pitch and Skytrax value-for-money score of 1.97.
第 37 名
4.3/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
Punctuality and comfort: 61.19% on-time arrivals in August 2026, a 28-inch minimum seat pitch, no free hold bag on any fare, and a £60 airport bag drop fee.
第 38 名
4.3/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
Passenger sentiment is weak, with just a 25% recommend rate and low Skytrax ground service scores
第 39 名
3.8/10
Laters.com 航空公司质量评分
Skytrax scores across comfort, food, wifi and ground service all sit below 2.5 out of 5.